Left Out


Something missing?

Well, you can safely assume that any information you are presented with has some relevant information “Left Out”.

The originator’s perspective, the logic bubble in which he perceives the world and how the information is applied are some possible reasons for the missing information.

Also, we may unconsciously miss the presented information because it doesn’t fit in our logic bubble or it contradicts our value system (we are biased). Left Out

What is Left Out could be an accident or we may simply not be aware of it. But the information could also be Left Out deliberately. It could be a way of framing or spinning an uncomfortable truth. Politicians and their spokesmen and women are notoriously for their way of deviating from the “truth”.

If confronted with a report,  from an accountancy or consultancy firm or from a parliamentary inquiry, be alert of Left Outs.

Don’t trust pleas from State prosecutors. Although they are legally required to seek the truth, as employees they are vulnerable for pressure from bosses and society to get suspects to get defendants convicted and to Left Out exculpatory evidence to the accused.

Left Out strategies are a proven means of state-owned and private press enterprises. In a next blog post, we will delve in the patterns of daily news to explore the mechanisms of press logic bubbles.

An interesting question has been posted by Eric Drexler in his contribution to How The Internet Changes The Way You Are Thinking: Nowadays we see better what there is not there.

Could we use the Internet to use the principle of Detection of Absence to develop knowledge, to test existing knowledge and to destroy anti-knowledge (wrong ideas)? Eric launches the idea to set up a Wikipedia, but not an encyclopedia with consensually validated information as “right”, but one with known controversies about facts. In such a kind of Wiki, both sides give as biased as possible but with their best proofs and fully documented their”facts”.

Make it a habit to ask yourself, before continuing reading beyond the heading of an article, title of a book or jumping to the summary of a report, “what is Left Out”. This could be the first step to a critical examination and exploration of the facts and information value of what you are about to start reading.

  • What is Left Out?
  • What information is relevant?
  • What information should be provided?

See also our blog post about Cassandra information.

Photo: “Left Coloured Dice Shows Www. Addresses” by Stuart Miles

9 Replies to “Left Out”

  1. Four UU Master’s students are starting a scientific journal for articles that probably wouldn’t have been published otherwise. Most journals aren’t eager for studies with either negative or hard to interpret results. But that work could actually help advance science, according to founders Martijn van der Meer and Stefan Gaillard.


    The two hope to receive short articles in which the authors are asked not only to explain their study according to the well-known IMRAD structure (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion), but also to include a paragraph on the original purpose of the study, as well as a ‘take home’ message. The articles are peer-reviewed double-blind. On top of that, historians, philosophers, sociologists and methodologists of science and theoreticians will be asked to reflect on what exactly is going on, and which scientific ‘errors’ the article highlights.

    JOTA / Journal of Trial and Error https://www.jtrialerror.com/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: